This way is taken from a book I read years ago: Anne Lionet: Secrets of Tarot, Dorling-Kindersley, London, 2001, pp. 82 and 83. This is actually one of the books I read fairly early in my tarot reading career, and to be honest, having obtained another copy about twenty years later, I'm horribly aware of how little of it seems familiar to me, so perhaps I didn't pay as much attention as I thought I did!
It gives this way of dividing the 22 Major Arcana cards into themes, which I suppose is a more developed way of the tendency in introductory texts to divide the tarot cards into good/bad or positive/negative. So here are the categories (some cards do fall into more than one category, this isn't a mistake):
1. Enlightenment: The Emperor, The Empress, The Magician, The High Priestess, The Hierophant, The Hermit and The World.
2. Responsibility (to Others): The Empress, The Emperor, Judgement, Temperance, and The Lovers.
3. Everyday Living: The Empress, Justice, and The Devil.
4. Reacting to Fate: Wheel of Fortune, The Hanged Man, Death, The Devil, The Tower, Judgement, The Moon, and The Star.
5. Cards of Light and Dark: Wheel of Fortune, The Hanged Man, Death, The Devil, The Tower, Judgement, The Moon, and The Star.
6. Cards of Reality: The Emperor, The Chariot, Strength, and The Sun.
7. Cards of Dreaming and Doing: Temperance, The Star, and The Chariot.
8. Cards of Moving Forward: The Fool, The Chariot, Wheel of Fortune, The Sun, Judgement, and The World.
As always, when reading someone else's approach to the tarot, I'm struck by the way the cards impact different people in so many ways and have endless resonance. These themes are largely here, as I said, to make me turn them over and see what they make me think, but I just have a couple of first impressions.The first is that I want to take the category of dreaming and doing further and see what I can do with it. I want to think about whether the whole Major Arcana, or even whole deck, could be dividing up into either dreaming or doing. The reality category also interests me because I would like to see what I can do with the idea of reality and do a similar thing to see if the deck could be divided up into reality/unreality as a whole. I personally don't do reversals because I think each card carries both the upright and reversed energies as a duality all the time, and to try to divide the two is a fruitless exercise: the entire point of paganism/magic/occultism is monism in which everything is one so certainly a card should be able to carry two different meanings at once!
The other impression, which is perhaps a caution about this division method, is that I personally would question whether you can make a category of Major Arcana cards which are *the ones* which carry meanings related to Everyday Living. I take the Minor Arcana as being more inclined towards everyday living, minor decisions, routine events, etc, and the Major Arcana as being about bigger perspectives, tendencies, and so on. Major is climate and Minor is weather, if you like, and therefore I'd be wary of assigning some Major Arcana cards to everyday stuff. Of course I'm immediately going to contradict myself by commenting that of course Major cards can mean ordinary pedestrian stuff, because the meanings are endlessly mutable, but then I did just say above that each card can carry at least two contradictory meanings at once!
I'm looking forward to thinking about these divisions and seeing where I go with them. Of course I'm still chewing over Meisner slowly in the bathroom so that will probably result in some posts at some point!
I rather enjoy categorising things and fitting things in boxes, so to speak, but as you already know (and have written), the world doesn't always comply and likes to create diversity and mischief by upending such categorisations (very wisely - and humorously, I might add). Somewhat related: I saw an article not too long ago about arranging books on shelves by the colour of their spines - I only skimmed it, but there was a lot of derision in the comments about it. The shelves did look harmonious and pretty, though.
ReplyDeleteUltimately, the meaning of the tarot cards (as with many things) will depend upon the person doing the reading and/or they that are being read for, won't it? (That's easy for me to say having never performed (in) a tarot reading in my life...)
Yes, it will.
DeleteAs you know I'm also fairly determined that the world will comply with the categories I seek to impose on it, whether it likes it or not, which says everything about this witch.
Not gonna lie, I LOVE categorising books by colour or size partly because it's the 'wrong' way!
I'd be careful about the human urge to categorize things too finely. Nature is definitely an entity that likes to color outside the lines. I broke a poor fellow's brain at a Halloween party once all because I refused to put myself in a pre-assigned box to his liking. He was an Engineering student, but I was all about symbiosis, mutualism, and analogies about lives and identities woven like tapestries.
ReplyDeleteIt's really too bad you don't play Bioware video games like Dragon Age, you'd be over the moon for some of the art and lore, I think. I could definitely see you playing a mage character. I'm always an Elven Rogue for at least my first playthrough. Hopefully this link won't be region locked and you can see some of the art. To be fair, they are artwork in the 'style' of tarot card and not actual tarot card, though I did see they made an actual set of tarot cards for the game Dragon Age: Inquisition but the cards are now very expensive due to their limited run from ten years ago.
No, wait, you mean tarot cards aren't psychodramatic images 'in the style of' an imagined mediaeval world? 😜
DeletePlease try again with the link because it didn't make it through to moderation and I'd love to see the art!